Error
Success
Warning
Information
#38 by Nelson Dog
Surely, when a rule changes, teams don't have to re-research that part from zero - they can just adapt their existing part to the new rules?
Wouldn't it be better to reduce the part rating to the new rule limit (maybe with a small 1-2 level penalty to reflect the fact that it won't be optimised for the new rules)?
#39 by Christopher Mastin
The only part that allows for an increase in performance value from season 10 to 11 is the gearbox (the rest stay the same or drop).
#39 by Christopher Mastin
Does that mean the gearbox would be available to base upon season 10?
#39 by Christopher Mastin
Do I have to research season 11 for the gearbox or will it just take potential from whats left of my season 10 part?
#39 by Christopher Mastin
Ie do you have to max the next seasons research every year for the whole car regardless of "new" or "based on parts".
#40 by Christopher Mastin
How does loophole research fit into this, if you have a loophole that allows higher does that mean you can now base on old parts?
#40 by Christopher Mastin
Whilst on loophole research, I have made a bug report and pm Frank, loophole research for me massively over charges, it routinely will charge a day what it quotes for the week.
#41 by Daniel Stevens
Adam yes- you don't have the 'best' designer - but your team in general did a top job on your car - ps we can all go back in the competition section of r&d and see your ratings - you did not have the best chassis from the off but it was not far behind and the rest of your parts were top or not far behind. - Yes your contracts have pushed the cars performance higher to get your champ - so you are right in that you don't need the best car but you still need it to be close and then to pay the bucks to get partner deals with the top contracts!
#42 by Daniel Stevens
Adam - just want to say congrats on your championship - I don't resent it - it has been long over due for you!
#46 by Dan Mills
If we have to design new cars from scratch each year, there has to be a better balance for the small teams. I'm sorry, but us big established guys have such an advantage. We can do everything quicker faster, and twice the amount.
How can a small team break a bigger team that can run two full design programmes for a current and next season on a team of 300+ staff.
It's not impossible, but it's highly unlikely.
Error
Guests can't post in the forum. Please sign in to be able to post in the forums.
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service.